Supplemental Comments on Federal Power Act Section 203 Blanket Authorizations for Investment Companies (SIFMA AMG)
SIFMA AMG provided comments to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission replying to certain comments filed in the Notice of Inquiry…
SIFMA and 21 associations provide comments to the Mayor and City Council of San Joaquin, California strongly opposing any proposal that would use the City’s eminent domain power to acquire certain underwater mortgage loans held by private-label mortgage-backed securities. The group believes that these proposals raise very serious legal and constitutional issues. No jurisdiction has ever used eminent domain to acquire underwater mortgages in securitized pools. Such a novel use of the eminent domain powers is unprecedented and would, in our view, not survive the multiple legal challenges that would ensue. In addition to the legal issues, the group warns the use of eminent domain will also be immensely destructive to U.S. mortgage markets in general and to specific communities using eminent domain, in particular. If the sanctity of the contractual relationship between a borrower and a creditor is undermined by eminent domain, both lenders and investors will be reluctant to provide future funding.
SIFMA AMG provided comments to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission replying to certain comments filed in the Notice of Inquiry…
SIFMA and SIFMA AMG provided comments to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) on their request for public comment on…
SIFMA AMG provided comments to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) on their consideration of various proposals to revise the…
We use cookies to provide our site visitors a valuable experience as well as relevant content and services. Please carefully review our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use; by using this website, you agree to the information set forth therein.