Ryan LLC, et al. v. FTC
Court: U.S. District Court (N.D. Texas) Amicus Issue: Whether the FTC exceeded its statutory authority under the FTC Act by…
SIFMA provided supplemental comments to multiple agencies, including the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and U.S. prudential regulators, regarding a proposal that would require the daily exchange of variation margin for non-cleared swaps, including those entered into by securitization transactions.
Related Material
SIFMA Submits Comment Letter to Multiple Agencies on Margin and Capital Requirements for Covered Swap Entities – (November 24, 2014)
SIFMA AMG Submits Comment Letter to Multiple Regulators Regarding Margin and Capital Requirements for Covered Swap Entities – (November 24, 2014)
Court: U.S. District Court (N.D. Texas) Amicus Issue: Whether the FTC exceeded its statutory authority under the FTC Act by…
SIFMA, The American Bankers Association (ABA), Bank Policy Institute (BPI), and the Financial Services Forum (FSF), provided comments to the…
Court: Delaware Supreme Court Amicus Issue: Whether the Delaware Supreme Court’s holding in Cantor Fitzgerald precludes reviewing forfeiture-for-competition provisions for…
We use cookies to provide our site visitors a valuable experience as well as relevant content and services. Please carefully review our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use; by using this website, you agree to the information set forth therein.