In re The Boeing Company Securities Litigation
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals (Fourth Circuit) Amicus Issue: Whether class action plaintiffs can satisfy the requirements of Comcast Corp.…
SIFMA provides comments to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) on the treatment of certain securities interests under the Orderly Liquidation Authority Title (Section 210(a)11) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the Dodd-Frank Act). SIFMA notes that there are inconsistencies between the U.S. Bankruptcy Code and Title II of the Dodd-Frank Act relating to the treatment of secured creditors. The inconsistencies have created concerns among securitization issuers and investors, as well as recipients of secured lending more generally. SIFMA believes that the current lack of clarity of how the inconsistencies will be resolved will affect issuances and the ability of securitization issuers to economically fund lending.
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals (Fourth Circuit) Amicus Issue: Whether class action plaintiffs can satisfy the requirements of Comcast Corp.…
SIFMA provided additional comments to U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in response to The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC’s (“Nasdaq”)…
SIFMA, SIFMA AMG, American Bankers Association (ABA), Bank Policy Institute (BPI), Institute of International Bankers (IIB), Investment Company Institute (ICI),…