The Goldman Sachs Group v. Sjunde Ap-Fonden
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals (Second Circuit) (Rule 23(f) petition) Amicus Issue: What is the legal standard in class certification…
SIFMA provided comments to the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (MSRB) regarding a revised draft proposal for MSRB Rule G-42 (Re-Proposed Rule G-42) on the standards of conduct and duties of municipal advisors when engaging in municipal advisory activities other than solicitations.
SIFMA applauds the MSRB’s efforts in revising its original proposal in light of comments received. SIFMA believes that the MSRB made great strides in making Re-Proposed Rule G-42 workable without compromising protections to municipal entities, obligated persons or investors. However, SIFMA still has significant concerns regarding certain aspects of Re-Proposed Rule G-42.
Related Material
Regulatory Notice – Request for Comment on Revised Draft MSRB Rule G-42, on Duties of Non-Solicitor Municipal Advisors (July 23, 2014)
Original Rule Proposal – SIFMA Submits Comments to the MSRB on Duties of Non-Solicitor Municipal Advisors (March 10, 2014)
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals (Second Circuit) (Rule 23(f) petition) Amicus Issue: What is the legal standard in class certification…
SIFMA and SIFMA AMG provided comments to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) requesting that the SEC take necessary steps…
SIFMA AMG, Investment Company Institute (ICI), American Chamber of Commerce in Australia (AmCham Australia), Information Technology Industry Council (ITI), Managed…