The Goldman Sachs Group v. Sjunde Ap-Fonden
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals (Second Circuit) (Rule 23(f) petition) Amicus Issue: What is the legal standard in class certification…
SIFMA provides comments to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on sponsored access, Exchange Act Release No. 59275; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2008-104. In the Proposal, NASDAQ proposes to define the scope of what it would consider to be a “sponsored access” arrangement. It further proposes to define the relevant parties – thus, the broker-dealer that sponsors a client or other counterparty’s direct access to an exchange would be a “Sponsoring Member,” and the sponsored client/counterparty would the “Sponsored Participant.” In furtherance of a broad obligation that Sponsoring Members be responsible for the conduct of their Sponsored Participants, the Proposal would impose substantive obligations on the Sponsoring Member in three different areas – Contractual Provisions, Financial Controls and Regulatory Controls – as discussed below. SIFMA strongly believes that having a good, consistent, predictable and practical rule is critically important to the industry.
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals (Second Circuit) (Rule 23(f) petition) Amicus Issue: What is the legal standard in class certification…
SIFMA and SIFMA AMG provided comments to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) requesting that the SEC take necessary steps…
SIFMA AMG, Investment Company Institute (ICI), American Chamber of Commerce in Australia (AmCham Australia), Information Technology Industry Council (ITI), Managed…