The Goldman Sachs Group v. Sjunde Ap-Fonden
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals (Second Circuit) (Rule 23(f) petition) Amicus Issue: What is the legal standard in class certification…
SIFMA provides comments to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on large trader implementation issues for broker-dealers, SEC Rule 13h-1. On April 20, 2012, the SEC took action to delay implementation of the broker-dealer duties under Rule 13h-1 (the April Order). The April Order temporarily exempted registered broker-dealers from Rule 13h-1’s recordkeeping and reporting requirements until November 30, 2012 for a certain limited category of transactions (Phase I) and temporarily exempted registered broker-dealers until May 1, 2013 from recordkeeping, reporting and monitoring requirements for all remaining transactions subject to Rule 13h-1 (Phase II).
While the April Order was welcomed by SIFMA and its members, it left unresolved many of the central implementation issues associated with Rule 13h-1 that we have raised in meetings with the SEC staff.
SIFMA raised significant implementation issues in a previous correspondence on March 29, 2012.
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals (Second Circuit) (Rule 23(f) petition) Amicus Issue: What is the legal standard in class certification…
SIFMA and SIFMA AMG provided comments to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) requesting that the SEC take necessary steps…
SIFMA AMG, Investment Company Institute (ICI), American Chamber of Commerce in Australia (AmCham Australia), Information Technology Industry Council (ITI), Managed…