The Goldman Sachs Group v. Sjunde Ap-Fonden
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals (Second Circuit) (Rule 23(f) petition) Amicus Issue: What is the legal standard in class certification…
Summary
SIFMA and 7 other associations provide comments to the California Conference Committee tasked with reconciling Assembly Bill 278 (Eng et al.) and Senate Bill 900 (Leno et al.), measures that are part of the California Attorney General’s Homeowner Bill of Rights. The groups believe, as proposed, these measures reflect an overly-complicated approach to prohibiting dual-tracking. In addition, the groups contend that these measures lack clarity around critical definitions, including whether the proposal is truly limited to first lien mortgages.
More Submissions
Type:
Modernizing Delivery Requirements Under the Federal Securities Laws (SIFMA and SIFMA AMG)
SIFMA and SIFMA AMG provided comments to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) requesting that the SEC take necessary steps…
Type:
Australia Public Country-by-Country Reporting Regime
SIFMA AMG, Investment Company Institute (ICI), American Chamber of Commerce in Australia (AmCham Australia), Information Technology Industry Council (ITI), Managed…