Modernizing Delivery Requirements Under the Federal Securities Laws (SIFMA and SIFMA AMG)
SIFMA and SIFMA AMG provided comments to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) requesting that the SEC take necessary steps…
SIFMA has submitted an Amicus “Friend of the Court” Brief.
Court:
U.S. Court of Appeals
(Second Circuit)
(Rule 23(f) petition)
Amicus Issue:
Whether the court erroneously certified an investor class based solely on the type of general, aspirational statements about a financial services firm’s business principles and internal controls that the Second Circuit has repeatedly held are not actionable, because no reasonable investor would rely on such statements.
Whether the court erroneously ruled that to rebut the fraud-on-the-marketpresumption of classwide reliance by showing that the challenged statements did not impact the issuer’s stock price, as authorized by Halliburton II, Defendants must “demonstrate a complete absence of price impact” with “conclusive evidence.”
Counsel of Record:
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
Charles E. Davidow
Marc Falcone
Robyn Tarnofsky
Other Amici:
None.
SIFMA and SIFMA AMG provided comments to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) requesting that the SEC take necessary steps…
SIFMA AMG, Investment Company Institute (ICI), American Chamber of Commerce in Australia (AmCham Australia), Information Technology Industry Council (ITI), Managed…
SIFMA provided comments to the U.S Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to confirm their discussion on July 29, 2025 with…