Court:
U.S. Court of Appeals (Sixth Circuit)
Amicus Issue:
Whether the lower court misapplied Rule 23(b)’s predominance requirement by depriving defendants of the opportunity under Halliburton II to rebut Basic’s presumption of reliance, and by failing to analyze plaintiffs’ proposed damages model in accordance with Comcast.
Counsel of Record:
Latham & Watkins LLP
Jeff G. Hammel
Douglas K. Yatter
Melissa Arbus Sherry
Marcy C. Priedeman
Other Amici:
U.S. Chamber of Commerce
SIFMA, The American Bankers Association (ABA), Bank Policy Institute (BPI), Independent Community Bankers of America (ICBA), and Institute of International…
SIFMA, SIFMA AMG, and the International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. (ISDA) provided comments in response to the U.S. Commodity…
SIFMA provided comments to the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Financial Services on the Markup of Various Capital Formation…