Regulatory Notice 25-04: Rule Modernization
SIFMA provided comments to FINRA in response to Regulatory Notice (RN) 25-04. We welcome this effort to modernize and update…
Court:
New York Court of Appeals
Amicus Issue:
(1) Given PDVSA’s argument that the Governing Documents are invalid and unenforceable for lack of approval by the National Assembly, does New York Uniform Commercial Code section 8-110(a)(1) require that the validity of the Governing Documents be determined under the Law of Venezuela, “the local law of the issuer’s jurisdiction”? (2) Does any principle of New York common law require that a New York court apply Venezuelan substantive law rather than New York substantive law in determining the validity of the Governing Documents? (3) Are the Governing Documents valid under New York law, notwithstanding the PDV Entities’ arguments regarding Venezuelan law?
Counsel of Record:
Holwell Shuster & Goldberg LLP
Vincent Levy
Daniel M. Sullivan
Other Amici:
U.S. Chamber of Commerce
SIFMA provided comments to FINRA in response to Regulatory Notice (RN) 25-04. We welcome this effort to modernize and update…
SIFMA, The Bank Policy Institute (BPI), the American Bankers Association (ABA), and the Managed Funds Association (MFA) provided comments to…
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals (Seventh Circuit) Amicus Issue: Whether the SEC properly denied CBOE’s proposed rule to reclassify order…