Regulatory Notice 25-04: FINRA Rulebook Modernization
SIFMA provided comments to FINRA in response to Regulatory Notice (RN) 25-04. We welcome this effort to modernize and update…
Court:
U.S. Court of Appeals
(Second Circuit)
(Rule 23(f) petition)
Amicus Issue:
Whether securities class action defendants should be afforded a meaningful opportunity to contest price impact at class certification by making a showing that severs the link between the alleged misrepresentation and the price received (or paid) by the plaintiff to rebut the Basic presumption of reliance and defeat class certification.
Counsel of Record:
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
Richard A. Rosen
Daniel S. Sinnreich
Jane B. O’Brien
Other Amici:
None.
SIFMA provided comments to FINRA in response to Regulatory Notice (RN) 25-04. We welcome this effort to modernize and update…
SIFMA, The Bank Policy Institute (BPI), the American Bankers Association (ABA), and the Managed Funds Association (MFA) provided comments to…
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals (Seventh Circuit) Amicus Issue: Whether the SEC properly denied CBOE’s proposed rule to reclassify order…