Court:
U.S. Supreme Court
Amicus Issue:
Whether allegations that a defined-contribution retirement plan paid or charged its participants fees that substantially exceeded fees for alternative available investment products or services are sufficient to state a claim against plan fiduciaries for breach of the duty of prudence under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA).
Counsel of Record:
Goodwin Proctor LLP
Jamie A. Santos
William M. Jay
Christina L. Hennecken
Other Amici:
U.S. Chamber
ACLI
APCIA
BRT
ERIC
PLUS
SIFMA, The American Bankers Association (ABA), Bank Policy Institute (BPI), Independent Community Bankers of America (ICBA), and Institute of International…
SIFMA, SIFMA AMG, and the International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. (ISDA) provided comments in response to the U.S. Commodity…
SIFMA provided comments to the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Financial Services on the Markup of Various Capital Formation…