Regulatory Notice 25-04: Rule Modernization
SIFMA provided comments to FINRA in response to Regulatory Notice (RN) 25-04. We welcome this effort to modernize and update…
Court:
U.S. Court of Appeals
(Eleventh Circuit)
Amicus Issue:
Whether the two-thirds one-third allocation between industry members and the participant exchanges is contrary to the Exchange Act and arbitrary and capricious. Whether the retrospective allocation of costs is contrary to the Exchange Act and arbitrary and capricious. Whether the SEC failed to conduct an adequate independent analysis of the CAT funding rules. Whether the uncertain, escalating and uncontrolled costs of the CAT system render the order arbitrary and capricious.
Counsel of Record:
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
Lorin L. Reisner
Kannon K. Shanmugam
Brian M. Lipshutz
Yishai Schwartz
David A. Hopen
Other Amici:
Committee on Capital Markets Regulation
Alternative Investment Management Assoc.
Virtu Financial, Inc.
Investment Company Institute
Managed Funds Assoc.
SIFMA provided comments to FINRA in response to Regulatory Notice (RN) 25-04. We welcome this effort to modernize and update…
SIFMA, The Bank Policy Institute (BPI), the American Bankers Association (ABA), and the Managed Funds Association (MFA) provided comments to…
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals (Seventh Circuit) Amicus Issue: Whether the SEC properly denied CBOE’s proposed rule to reclassify order…