Supplemental Comments on Federal Power Act Section 203 Blanket Authorizations for Investment Companies (SIFMA AMG)
SIFMA AMG provided comments to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission replying to certain comments filed in the Notice of Inquiry…
Court:
U.S. Supreme Court
Amicus Issue:
Whether a communication involving both legal and non-legal advice is protected by attorney-client privilege where obtaining or providing legal advice was one of the significant purposes behind the communication.
Counsel of Record:
Williams & Connolly LLP
William T. Burke
John S. Williams
Jesse T. Clay
Kees D. Thompson
Sumer Ghazala
Jacob L. Burnett
Other Amici:
U.S. Chamber of Commerce
Assoc. of Corporate Counsel
SIFMA AMG provided comments to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission replying to certain comments filed in the Notice of Inquiry…
SIFMA and SIFMA AMG provided comments to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) on their request for public comment on…
SIFMA AMG provided comments to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) on their consideration of various proposals to revise the…
We use cookies to provide our site visitors a valuable experience as well as relevant content and services. Please carefully review our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use; by using this website, you agree to the information set forth therein.