Regulatory Notice 25-04: FINRA Rulebook Modernization
SIFMA provided comments to FINRA in response to Regulatory Notice (RN) 25-04. We welcome this effort to modernize and update…
Summary
Court:
U.S. Supreme Court
Amicus Issue:
Whether allegations that a defined-contribution retirement plan paid or charged its participants fees that substantially exceeded fees for alternative available investment products or services are sufficient to state a claim against plan fiduciaries for breach of the duty of prudence under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA).
Counsel of Record:
Goodwin Proctor LLP
Jamie A. Santos
William M. Jay
Christina L. Hennecken
Other Amici:
U.S. Chamber
ACLI
APCIA
BRT
ERIC
PLUS
More Submissions
Type:
Data Security Reforms for Federal Financial Regulators (Joint Trades)
SIFMA, The Bank Policy Institute (BPI), the American Bankers Association (ABA), and the Managed Funds Association (MFA) provided comments to…
Type:
Cboe Exchange v. SEC
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals (Seventh Circuit) Amicus Issue: Whether the SEC properly denied CBOE’s proposed rule to reclassify order…