Supplemental Comments on Federal Power Act Section 203 Blanket Authorizations for Investment Companies (SIFMA AMG)
SIFMA AMG provided comments to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission replying to certain comments filed in the Notice of Inquiry…
Court:
U.S. Supreme Court (pet. for writ of cert.)
Amicus Issue:
Whether unsubstantiated public allegations about an issuer or its business, without any additional corroborating disclosure or event, reveal to an efficient market the ‘truth’ for purposes of establishing loss causation under Dura (as held by the Sixth and Ninth Circuits, in direct conflict with the Eleventh Circuit).
Counsel of Record:
Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP
Jonathan K. Youngwood
Craig S. Waldman
Joshua Polster
Daniel Owsley
Other Amici:
U.S. Chamber of Commerce
SIFMA AMG provided comments to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission replying to certain comments filed in the Notice of Inquiry…
SIFMA and SIFMA AMG provided comments to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) on their request for public comment on…
SIFMA AMG provided comments to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) on their consideration of various proposals to revise the…
We use cookies to provide our site visitors a valuable experience as well as relevant content and services. Please carefully review our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use; by using this website, you agree to the information set forth therein.