Regulatory Notice 25-04: FINRA Rulebook Modernization
SIFMA provided comments to FINRA in response to Regulatory Notice (RN) 25-04. We welcome this effort to modernize and update…
Summary
Court:
New York Court of Appeals
Amicus Issue:
Whether a plaintiff may circumvent a sole remedy provision within a pooling and services agreement – which provides that the sole remedy for a breach of the mortgage representations is cure or repurchase of the loans – by also alleging that the defendant willfully or with gross negligence included numerous defective loans in the pool and failed to repurchase such loans on demand.
Counsel of Record:
Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP
Shahzeb Lari
Other Amici:
None.
More Submissions
Type:
Data Security Reforms for Federal Financial Regulators (Joint Trades)
SIFMA, The Bank Policy Institute (BPI), the American Bankers Association (ABA), and the Managed Funds Association (MFA) provided comments to…
Type:
Cboe Exchange v. SEC
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals (Seventh Circuit) Amicus Issue: Whether the SEC properly denied CBOE’s proposed rule to reclassify order…