Supplemental Comments on Federal Power Act Section 203 Blanket Authorizations for Investment Companies (SIFMA AMG)
SIFMA AMG provided comments to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission replying to certain comments filed in the Notice of Inquiry…
Court:
U.S. Supreme Court
(petition for writ of cert.)
Amicus Issue:
Whether the court violated Halliburton II, misapplied the burden of proof, and erred by relieving plaintiffs in the Second Circuit of any burden of showing that there was a price impact of news on the defendant’s stock price. Whether a class may be certified in the absence of proof that an administratively feasible means exists by which the putative class member (and the court and defendants) can determine whether he or she is a member of the class.
Counsel of Record:
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
Richard A. Rosen
Charles E. Davidow
Other Amici:
None
SIFMA AMG provided comments to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission replying to certain comments filed in the Notice of Inquiry…
SIFMA and SIFMA AMG provided comments to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) on their request for public comment on…
SIFMA AMG provided comments to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) on their consideration of various proposals to revise the…
We use cookies to provide our site visitors a valuable experience as well as relevant content and services. Please carefully review our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use; by using this website, you agree to the information set forth therein.