Wells Fargo v. SEB Investment Management
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals (Ninth Circuit) (Rule 23(f) petition) Amicus Issue: Whether class action plaintiffs can satisfy the requirements…
SIFMA provides comments to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on large trader implementation issues for broker-dealers, SEC Rule 13h-1. On April 20, 2012, the SEC took action to delay implementation of the broker-dealer duties under Rule 13h-1 (the April Order). The April Order temporarily exempted registered broker-dealers from Rule 13h-1’s recordkeeping and reporting requirements until November 30, 2012 for a certain limited category of transactions (Phase I) and temporarily exempted registered broker-dealers until May 1, 2013 from recordkeeping, reporting and monitoring requirements for all remaining transactions subject to Rule 13h-1 (Phase II).
While the April Order was welcomed by SIFMA and its members, it left unresolved many of the central implementation issues associated with Rule 13h-1 that we have raised in meetings with the SEC staff.
SIFMA raised significant implementation issues in a previous correspondence on March 29, 2012.
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals (Ninth Circuit) (Rule 23(f) petition) Amicus Issue: Whether class action plaintiffs can satisfy the requirements…
Chief Information Security Officer of Northern Trust, Karl Schimmeck, delivered testimony on behalf of SIFMA at a hearing before the…
Court: Colorado Supreme Court Amicus Issue: Whether C.R.C.P. 11 (which is identical to Fed.R.Civ.P. 11), which imposes a non-delegable duty…