Ryan LLC, et al. v. FTC
Court: U.S. District Court (N.D. Texas) Amicus Issue: Whether the FTC exceeded its statutory authority under the FTC Act by…
SIFMA provides comments to the U.S. Department of the Treasury, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) on jointly proposed rules relating to credit risk retention. The jointly proposed rules are intended to implement the requirements of section 941(b) of the Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act). SIFMA requests clarification on the jointly proposed rules, in particular, the key concept of “par value,” which is used in the proposed rules, but is not defined.
Court: U.S. District Court (N.D. Texas) Amicus Issue: Whether the FTC exceeded its statutory authority under the FTC Act by…
SIFMA, The American Bankers Association (ABA), Bank Policy Institute (BPI), and the Financial Services Forum (FSF), provided comments to the…
Court: Delaware Supreme Court Amicus Issue: Whether the Delaware Supreme Court’s holding in Cantor Fitzgerald precludes reviewing forfeiture-for-competition provisions for…
We use cookies to provide our site visitors a valuable experience as well as relevant content and services. Please carefully review our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use; by using this website, you agree to the information set forth therein.