Citigroup v. Otto Candies
Court: U.S. Supreme Court (pet. for writ of cert.) Amicus Issue: Whether Section 1964(c) of the Private Securities Litigation Reform…
SIFMA provides comments to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) on the treatment of certain securities interests under the Orderly Liquidation Authority Title (Section 210(a)11) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the Dodd-Frank Act). SIFMA notes that there are inconsistencies between the U.S. Bankruptcy Code and Title II of the Dodd-Frank Act relating to the treatment of secured creditors. The inconsistencies have created concerns among securitization issuers and investors, as well as recipients of secured lending more generally. SIFMA believes that the current lack of clarity of how the inconsistencies will be resolved will affect issuances and the ability of securitization issuers to economically fund lending.
Court: U.S. Supreme Court (pet. for writ of cert.) Amicus Issue: Whether Section 1964(c) of the Private Securities Litigation Reform…
SIFMA provided comments to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) requesting that it take necessary steps to improve the…
SIFMA AMG, Alternative Investment Management Association (AIMA), American Council of Life Insurers (ACLI), American Property Casualty Insurance Association (APCIA), Blockchain…