State of Texas, et al. v. BlackRock, et. al.

Published on:
March 24, 2025

Court:

U.S. District Court

(E.D. Texas)

Amicus Issue:

Whether passive investors could be in violation of Section 7 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914, which prohibits the acquisition of stock when “the effect of such acquisition may be substantially to lessen competition,” simply because the passive investors have cross-ownership interests in competing companies.

Counsel of Record:

Morgan Lewis LLP

Jon R. Roellke

William S.D. Cravens

William T. McEnroe

Zachary M. Johns

Stephen LaBrecque

Other Amici:

None.

Details

Download

More Content

  • Testimony
    Mar 25, 2026

    Testimony on Tokenization and the Future of Securities: Modernizing Our Capital Markets

  • Amicus Briefs
    Mar 20, 2026

    Johnson & Johnson v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assoc.

  • Letters
    Mar 19, 2026

    Proposed Rule Change to Extend the Exchange’s U.S. Equity Trading Hours to 23 Hours a Day

    SIFMA comments to the SEC on Nasdaq’s proposal to expand equity and ETP trading hours to 23 hours a day, five days a week.

Get the latest trends, stats, and research on financial markets and securities.