State of Texas, et al. v. BlackRock, et. al.

Published on:
March 24, 2025

Court:

U.S. District Court

(E.D. Texas)

Amicus Issue:

Whether passive investors could be in violation of Section 7 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914, which prohibits the acquisition of stock when “the effect of such acquisition may be substantially to lessen competition,” simply because the passive investors have cross-ownership interests in competing companies.

Counsel of Record:

Morgan Lewis LLP

Jon R. Roellke

William S.D. Cravens

William T. McEnroe

Zachary M. Johns

Stephen LaBrecque

Other Amici:

None.

Details

Download

More Content

  • Letters
    Jan 29, 2026

    Treasury and IRS Notice 2025-68 on Section 530A Trump Accounts

    SIFMA provided comments to the Office of Associate Chief Counsel on Notice 2025-68 regarding section 530A Trump accounts on certain rules that Treasury and the IRS are considering proposing as part of this framework.
  • Letters
    Jan 15, 2026

    Wallet Providers and Broker Dealer Regulation

    SIFMA and SIFMA AMG submitted comments to the SEC Crypto Task Force regarding the regulatory treatment of wallet providers for tokenized securities.
  • Letters
    Jan 13, 2026

    National Securities Exchange Fee Filings

    SIFMA submitted a comment letter to the SEC urging the suspension and disapproval of recent national securities exchange fee increases.

Get the latest trends, stats, and research on financial markets and securities.