Court:
U.S. District Court
(E.D. Texas)
Amicus Issue:
Whether passive investors could be in violation of Section 7 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914, which prohibits the acquisition of stock when “the effect of such acquisition may be substantially to lessen competition,” simply because the passive investors have cross-ownership interests in competing companies.
Counsel of Record:
Morgan Lewis LLP
Jon R. Roellke
William S.D. Cravens
William T. McEnroe
Zachary M. Johns
Stephen LaBrecque
Other Amici:
None.
SIFMA and ISDA submitted comments to the CFTC on its proposed Revisions to Business Conduct and Swap Documentation Requirements for…
Court: U.S. Supreme Court (pet. for writ of cert.) Amicus Issue: Whether the rebuttable fraud-on-the-market presumption for establishing reliance in…
SIFMA provided comments to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on to urge the Commission to disapprove the proposal.