State of Texas, et al. v. BlackRock, et. al.

Published on:
March 24, 2025

Court:

U.S. District Court

(E.D. Texas)

Amicus Issue:

Whether passive investors could be in violation of Section 7 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914, which prohibits the acquisition of stock when “the effect of such acquisition may be substantially to lessen competition,” simply because the passive investors have cross-ownership interests in competing companies.

Counsel of Record:

Morgan Lewis LLP

Jon R. Roellke

William S.D. Cravens

William T. McEnroe

Zachary M. Johns

Stephen LaBrecque

Other Amici:

None.

Details

Download

More Content

  • Letters
    Mar 18, 2026

    Proposed Rule Change to Amend FINRA Rule 2210

    SIFMA comments in support of FINRA’s proposed Rule 2210 changes, urging closer alignment with the SEC’s Marketing Rule.
  • Letters
    Mar 17, 2026

    SEC RFI on Exchanges, ATSs, and Tokenized Securities

    SIFMA urges the SEC to support market innovation through rulemaking that protects investors, transparency, and market integrity.
  • Letters
    Mar 16, 2026

    MSRB Rule G-27 on Dealer Supervision

    SIFMA comments on MSRB Notice 2026-012, supporting rule modernization that reduces compliance burdens while protecting investors and issuers.

Get the latest trends, stats, and research on financial markets and securities.