State of Texas, et al. v. BlackRock, et. al.

Published on:
March 24, 2025

Court:

U.S. District Court

(E.D. Texas)

Amicus Issue:

Whether passive investors could be in violation of Section 7 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914, which prohibits the acquisition of stock when “the effect of such acquisition may be substantially to lessen competition,” simply because the passive investors have cross-ownership interests in competing companies.

Counsel of Record:

Morgan Lewis LLP

Jon R. Roellke

William S.D. Cravens

William T. McEnroe

Zachary M. Johns

Stephen LaBrecque

Other Amici:

None.

Details

Download

More Content

  • Letters
    Sep 11, 2026

    Request for Comment on Regulatory Notice 26-14 Proposals

    SIFMA comments on FINRA’s proposed modernization of Rule 2210, supporting a risk-based, technology-neutral approach to communications.
  • Letters
    Sep 08, 2026

    Electronic Delivery of Forms 1099-DA in Proposed Regulations and Notice 2026-4

    SIFMA comments on Treasury and IRS proposals for electronic delivery of Forms 1099-DA and other payee statements.
  • Letters
    Sep 03, 2026

    Proposed Automated Decision-Making Technology and Conversational Artificial Intelligence Service Rules

    SIFMA comments on Colorado’s proposed rules for automated decision-making technology and conversational AI services.

Get the latest trends, stats, and research on financial markets and securities.