*Amicus Briefs

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Langford Reply Brief

Published on:
September 9, 2008
Committee:

SIFMA Reply Brief in support of its motion for leave to file a brief Amicu Curiae

See: Securities and Exchange Commission v. Langford, et al. – August 7, 2008

Amicus Issue:

Whether Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 apply to interest rate swap transactions under which payments are based on the SIFMA Municipal Swap Index.

Counsel of Record:

Cadwalader Wickensham & Taft

One World Financial Center

New York, NY 10287

Jonathan M. Hoff

Lary Stromfeld

Maurine Bartlett

Tom M. Fini

Cabaniss, Johnston, Gardner, Dumas & O’Neal LLP

2001 Park Place, North

Suite 700

Birmingham, AL 35203

Crawford S. McGivaren, Jr.

Details

Download

More Content

  • Amicus Briefs
    Oct 05, 2026

    In re The Boeing Company Securities Litigation

  • Letters
    Oct 05, 2026

    Reducing Duplicative Regulation and Expanding Exemptions for Commodity Pool Operators and Commodity Trading Advisors

    SIFMA AMG comments on CFTC proposals to reduce duplicative regulation for certain CPOs and CTAs and account for inflation.
  • Letters
    Sep 30, 2026

    Proposed Rule Change to Amend FINRA Rules 0150, 2165, 4512 and to Adopt FINRA Rule 2166

    SIFMA Comments to SEC in support of the proposed rule changes to improve the utilization of Rules 2165 and 4512, as well as the new Rule 2166 to allow for a temporary delay for suspected fraud.

Get the latest trends, stats, and research on financial markets and securities.