Isaiah v. JPMorgan Chase Bank

Published on:
January 15, 2020

Court:

U.S. Court of Appeals

(Eleventh Circuit)

Amicus Issue:

Whether a court appointed receiver for a Ponzi entity may sue banks on behalf of aggrieved investors (arguing e.g., the bank aided and abetted the Ponzi scheme) since the receiver is actually stepping into the shoes of the tortfeasor Ponzi entity, such that it ends up representing both the Ponzi perpetrator and its victims.

Counsel of Record:

Greenberg Traurig, P.A.

Mark F. Bideau

Elliot H. Scherker

Brigid F. Cech Samole

Homer Bonner Jacobs

Peter W. Homer

Other Amici:

Bank Policy Institute

Florida Bankers Association

Details

Download

More Content

  • Letters
    Oct 22, 2026

    Treasury/IRS Notice 2026-49: Guidance on Section 324 of the SECURE 2.0 Act with Respect to Rollovers

    SIFMA supports modernizing retirement plan rollovers through standardized electronic processes, fraud safeguards and appropriate implementation timelines.
  • Amicus Briefs
    Oct 21, 2026

    In re USD LIBOR Litigation

  • Letters
    Oct 20, 2026

    SEC’s Proposed Rule Regulation Crypto Assets

    SIFMA and SIFMA AMG provide recommendations to the SEC on its proposed crypto asset regulation, addressing regulatory clarity, implementation and investor protection.

Get the latest trends, stats, and research on financial markets and securities.