Isaiah v. JPMorgan Chase Bank

Published on:
January 15, 2020

Court:

U.S. Court of Appeals

(Eleventh Circuit)

Amicus Issue:

Whether a court appointed receiver for a Ponzi entity may sue banks on behalf of aggrieved investors (arguing e.g., the bank aided and abetted the Ponzi scheme) since the receiver is actually stepping into the shoes of the tortfeasor Ponzi entity, such that it ends up representing both the Ponzi perpetrator and its victims.

Counsel of Record:

Greenberg Traurig, P.A.

Mark F. Bideau

Elliot H. Scherker

Brigid F. Cech Samole

Homer Bonner Jacobs

Peter W. Homer

Other Amici:

Bank Policy Institute

Florida Bankers Association

Details

Download

More Content

  • Amicus Briefs
    Oct 05, 2026

    In re The Boeing Company Securities Litigation

  • Letters
    Oct 05, 2026

    Reducing Duplicative Regulation and Expanding Exemptions for Commodity Pool Operators and Commodity Trading Advisors

    SIFMA AMG comments on CFTC proposals to reduce duplicative regulation for certain CPOs and CTAs and account for inflation.
  • Letters
    Sep 30, 2026

    Proposed Rule Change to Amend FINRA Rules 0150, 2165, 4512 and to Adopt FINRA Rule 2166

    SIFMA Comments to SEC in support of the proposed rule changes to improve the utilization of Rules 2165 and 4512, as well as the new Rule 2166 to allow for a temporary delay for suspected fraud.

Get the latest trends, stats, and research on financial markets and securities.