Cyan, Inc. v. Beaver County Employees Retirement Fund

Published on:
September 5, 2017

Court:

Cyan, Inc. v. Beaver County Employees Retirement Fund

Amicus Issue:

Whether state courts retain concurrent jurisdiction over class action cases which raise Securities Act of 1933 claims, or whether such claims are removable under the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act (SLUSA).

Counsel of Record:

Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP

James C. Dugan

Mary J. Eaton

Frank Scaduto

Stephanie L. Klock

Other Amici:

U.S. Chamber of Commerce

National Venture Capital Association

Details

Download

More Content

  • Letters
    Oct 22, 2026

    Treasury/IRS Notice 2026-49: Guidance on Section 324 of the SECURE 2.0 Act with Respect to Rollovers

    SIFMA supports modernizing retirement plan rollovers through standardized electronic processes, fraud safeguards and appropriate implementation timelines.
  • Amicus Briefs
    Oct 21, 2026

    In re USD LIBOR Litigation

  • Letters
    Oct 20, 2026

    SEC’s Proposed Rule Regulation Crypto Assets

    SIFMA and SIFMA AMG provide recommendations to the SEC on its proposed crypto asset regulation, addressing regulatory clarity, implementation and investor protection.

Get the latest trends, stats, and research on financial markets and securities.