Bitounis v. Interactive Brokers LLC

Published on:
February 3, 2025

Court:

Ohio Supreme Court

Amicus Issue:

Whether a broker-dealer or banker may be held liable under Ohio’s aiding and abetting statute, consistent with Boyd v. Kingdom Trust Co., 2018 Ohio 3156, where the alleged aiding and abetting activity involves nothing more that providing usual and customary brokerage/banking services.

Counsel of Record:

Bricker Graydon LLP

Brodi J. Conover

Ryan L. Richardson

Other Amici:

Ohio Bankers League

Details

Download

More Content

  • Letters
    Nov 09, 2026

    Political Contributions by Certain Investment Advisers (SIFMA AMG)

    SIFMA AMG supports the SEC’s proposal to rescind the investment adviser pay-to-play rule, citing compliance burdens, costs and restrictions on political speech.
  • Letters
    Nov 09, 2026

    Political Contributions by Certain Investment Advisers

    SIFMA comments on the SEC’s proposal to rescind the political contributions rule for investment advisers, citing compliance burdens and existing safeguards.
  • Amicus Briefs
    Nov 06, 2026

    Blockchain Assoc. and Crypto Council for Innovation v. IL

Get the latest trends, stats, and research on financial markets and securities.