Anderson v. Intel Corp. Inv. Policy Comm.
Published on:
July 9, 2026
Committee:
Court:
U.S. Supreme Court
Amicus Issue:
Whether, for claims predicated on alleged retirement fund underperformance, pleading that an ERISA fiduciary failed to use the requisite “care, skill, prudence, or diligence” requires alleging facts showing how the outperforming comparator is a “meaningful benchmark” for the fund at issue.
Counsel of Record:
Goodwin Procter LLP
Jaime A. Santos
Rohiniyurie Tashima
Jordan Bock
Other Amici:
U.S. Chamber of Commerce
American Retirement Assoc.
Business Roundtable
CIEBA
Erisa Industry Committee
Stable Value Inv. Assoc.