Anderson v. Intel Corp. Inv. Policy Comm.
Published on:
July 9, 2026
Committee:
Court:
U.S. Supreme Court
Amicus Issue:
Whether, for claims predicated on alleged retirement fund underperformance, pleading that an ERISA fiduciary failed to use the requisite “care, skill, prudence, or diligence” requires alleging facts showing how the outperforming comparator is a “meaningful benchmark” for the fund at issue.
Counsel of Record:
Goodwin Procter LLP
Jaime A. Santos
Rohiniyurie Tashima
Jordan Bock
Other Amici:
U.S. Chamber of Commerce
American Retirement Assoc.
Business Roundtable
CIEBA
Erisa Industry Committee
Stable Value Inv. Assoc.
Details
More Content
- LettersJul 06, 2026
Staff Report on the Definitions of “Security-Based Swap Dealer” and “Major Security- Based Swap Participant” (SIFMA and ISDA)
SIFMA and ISDA submitted joint comments to the Staff Report recommending the SEC maintain the current de minimis threshold levels for purposes of registration.
Details
More Content
- LettersJul 06, 2026
Staff Report on the Definitions of “Security-Based Swap Dealer” and “Major Security- Based Swap Participant” (SIFMA and ISDA)
SIFMA and ISDA submitted joint comments to the Staff Report recommending the SEC maintain the current de minimis threshold levels for purposes of registration.