Bitounis v. Interactive Brokers LLC
Published on:
February 3, 2025
Committee:
Court:
Ohio Supreme Court
Amicus Issue:
Whether a broker-dealer or banker may be held liable under Ohio’s aiding and abetting statute, consistent with Boyd v. Kingdom Trust Co., 2018 Ohio 3156, where the alleged aiding and abetting activity involves nothing more that providing usual and customary brokerage/banking services.
Counsel of Record:
Bricker Graydon LLP
Brodi J. Conover
Ryan L. Richardson
Other Amici:
Ohio Bankers League
Details
More Content
- LettersJul 06, 2026
Staff Report on the Definitions of “Security-Based Swap Dealer” and “Major Security- Based Swap Participant” (SIFMA and ISDA)
SIFMA and ISDA submitted joint comments to the Staff Report recommending the SEC maintain the current de minimis threshold levels for purposes of registration.
Details
More Content
- LettersJul 06, 2026
Staff Report on the Definitions of “Security-Based Swap Dealer” and “Major Security- Based Swap Participant” (SIFMA and ISDA)
SIFMA and ISDA submitted joint comments to the Staff Report recommending the SEC maintain the current de minimis threshold levels for purposes of registration.