Bitounis v. Interactive Brokers LLC

Published on:
February 3, 2025

Court:

Ohio Supreme Court

Amicus Issue:

Whether a broker-dealer or banker may be held liable under Ohio’s aiding and abetting statute, consistent with Boyd v. Kingdom Trust Co., 2018 Ohio 3156, where the alleged aiding and abetting activity involves nothing more that providing usual and customary brokerage/banking services.

Counsel of Record:

Bricker Graydon LLP

Brodi J. Conover

Ryan L. Richardson

Other Amici:

Ohio Bankers League

Details

Download

More Content

  • Letters
    Sep 30, 2026

    Proposed Rule Change to Amend FINRA Rules 0150, 2165, 4512 and to Adopt FINRA Rule 2166

    SIFMA Comments to SEC in support of the proposed rule changes to improve the utilization of Rules 2165 and 4512, as well as the new Rule 2166 to allow for a temporary delay for suspected fraud.
  • Letters
    Sep 25, 2026

    Swap Execution Facility Order Book Requirement for Permitted Transactions (SIFMA AMG)

  • Letters
    Sep 25, 2026

    Treasury/IRS Notice 2026-48 Intent to Issue Regulations with Respect to Saver’s Match Contributions

    SIFMA comments on the IRS Saver’s Match program, offering recommendations to support efficient implementation and delivery of matching contributions.

Get the latest trends, stats, and research on financial markets and securities.