Standards for Safeguarding Customer Information

Published on:
August 2, 2019
Submitted to:
FTC
Submitted by:
SIFMA, BPI-BITS, ABA

Summary

SIFMA, Bank Policy Institute (BPI)-BITS, and the American Bankers Association (ABA) joint comments to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) regarding the FTC Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on the Standards for Safeguarding Customer Information (Safeguards Rule). The Associations share the FTC commitment to protecting the privacy interests of all Americans by safeguarding their personal information.

Excerpt

August 2, 2019

Via Electronic Submission through https://www.regulations.gov/docket?D=FTC-2019-0019

David Lincicum and Allison M. Lefrak

Division of Privacy and Identity Protection

Bureau of Consumer Protection

Federal Trade Commission

600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20580

Re: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking – Standards for Safeguarding Customer Information, RIN 3084-AB35 (Safeguards Rule, 16 C.F.R. part 314, Project No. P145407)

Ladies and Gentlemen:

The Bank Policy Institute (BPI) – BITS, the American Bankers Association (ABA), and the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (SIFMA) (collectively, the “Associations”)1 appreciate the opportunity to comment on the Federal Trade Commission’s (“FTC”) proposal to amend the Standards for Safeguarding Customer Information (the “Safeguards Rule” or “Rule”).2 We share your commitment to protecting the interests of all Americans by safeguarding their personal information. We agree with the FTC’s view that it is important “to provide financial institutions with the flexibility to shape [] information security programs to their particular business and to allow the programs to adapt to changes in technology and threats to the security and integrity of customer information.”3

The Associations also appreciate the FTC’s efforts to clarify the scope of the Safeguards Rule in light of changes to the authority of the Privacy Rule. We also appreciate the FTC’s efforts to coordinate key aspects of its proposed amendments with other agencies’ regulatory provisions, notably, amending the definition of “financial institution” so that it cross-references permissible activities enumerated by the Federal Reserve Board in  12 C.F.R. §§ 225.28 and .86.4

Continue reading >

1 Descriptions of the Associations are provided in Annex A of this letter.

2 16 C.F.R. part 314.

3 Safeguards Rule, 84 Fed. Reg. 13,158, 13,159 (proposed Apr. 4, 2019) (to be codified at 16 C.F.R. pt. 314).

4 Lists of permissible non-banking activities for bank holding companies and financial holding companies, respectively.

Details

Download

More Content

  • Amicus Briefs
    Oct 05, 2026

    In re The Boeing Company Securities Litigation

  • Letters
    Oct 05, 2026

    Reducing Duplicative Regulation and Expanding Exemptions for Commodity Pool Operators and Commodity Trading Advisors

    SIFMA AMG comments on CFTC proposals to reduce duplicative regulation for certain CPOs and CTAs and account for inflation.
  • Letters
    Sep 30, 2026

    Proposed Rule Change to Amend FINRA Rules 0150, 2165, 4512 and to Adopt FINRA Rule 2166

    SIFMA Comments to SEC in support of the proposed rule changes to improve the utilization of Rules 2165 and 4512, as well as the new Rule 2166 to allow for a temporary delay for suspected fraud.

Get the latest trends, stats, and research on financial markets and securities.