Proposed Amendments to the Investment Adviser Pay-to-Play Rules

Published on:
January 24, 2011

SIFMA provides comments to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on proposed amendments to rule 206(4)(5), the Investment Adviser Pay-to-Play rules which regulates an investment adviser’s interactions with governmental clients such as public pension funds. That rule had just been finalized in July 2010 after an eleven-month comment and amendment process.  The most-recent amendments – proposed in November 2010 – would make substantial changes to the Investment Adviser Pay-to-Play Rule, including replacing the current category of permitted ‘regulated persons’ with registered “municipal advisors” (the definition of which is subject to a separate, still-pending rulemaking), and shifting regulatory jurisdiction over broker-dealers who solicit fund investments from government entities on behalf of investment advisers to the MSRB from FINRA.

Details

Download

More Content

  • Amicus Briefs
    Oct 05, 2026

    In re The Boeing Company Securities Litigation

  • Letters
    Oct 05, 2026

    Reducing Duplicative Regulation and Expanding Exemptions for Commodity Pool Operators and Commodity Trading Advisors

    SIFMA AMG comments on CFTC proposals to reduce duplicative regulation for certain CPOs and CTAs and account for inflation.
  • Letters
    Sep 30, 2026

    Proposed Rule Change to Amend FINRA Rules 0150, 2165, 4512 and to Adopt FINRA Rule 2166

    SIFMA Comments to SEC in support of the proposed rule changes to improve the utilization of Rules 2165 and 4512, as well as the new Rule 2166 to allow for a temporary delay for suspected fraud.

Get the latest trends, stats, and research on financial markets and securities.