Opposing AB 1844 Unless Amended

Published on:
June 22, 2012

SIFMA provides comments to the California State Assembly opposing AB 1844, as currently drafted.  SIFMA believes that while AB 1844 is well-intended, it conflicts with the duty of securities firms to supervise, record, and maintain business-related communications as required by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). If this bill passes in its current form, firms will be in the untenable position of having to violate either state law or their FINRA obligations.  SIFMA recommends amending the bill such that there would be an exception for financial services employees that use their social media accounts for purposes of business and are already subject to federal, state, an self-regulatory organization supervision.

Details

Download

More Content

  • Letters
    Oct 22, 2026

    Treasury/IRS Notice 2026-49: Guidance on Section 324 of the SECURE 2.0 Act with Respect to Rollovers

    SIFMA supports modernizing retirement plan rollovers through standardized electronic processes, fraud safeguards and appropriate implementation timelines.
  • Amicus Briefs
    Oct 21, 2026

    In re USD LIBOR Litigation

  • Letters
    Oct 20, 2026

    SEC’s Proposed Rule Regulation Crypto Assets

    SIFMA and SIFMA AMG provide recommendations to the SEC on its proposed crypto asset regulation, addressing regulatory clarity, implementation and investor protection.

Get the latest trends, stats, and research on financial markets and securities.