Proposed Use of Eminent Domain by California Municipalities to Seize Mortgage Loans Held in MBS

Published on:
July 21, 2012

SIFMA provides comments to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, and the U.S. Departments of Treasury and Housing and Urban Development sharing serious concerns regarding the proposed use of eminent domain by San Bernardino County, California, and possibly other municipalities, to seize mortgage loans held in private-label mortgage-backed securities (MBS). Legal experts, including SIFMA’s counsel, former Solicitor General Walter Dellinger, believe this use of eminent domain to be unconstitutional, among numerous other legal disabilities.

Details

Download

More Content

  • Amicus Briefs
    Oct 05, 2026

    In re The Boeing Company Securities Litigation

  • Letters
    Oct 05, 2026

    Reducing Duplicative Regulation and Expanding Exemptions for Commodity Pool Operators and Commodity Trading Advisors

    SIFMA AMG comments on CFTC proposals to reduce duplicative regulation for certain CPOs and CTAs and account for inflation.
  • Letters
    Sep 30, 2026

    Proposed Rule Change to Amend FINRA Rules 0150, 2165, 4512 and to Adopt FINRA Rule 2166

    SIFMA Comments to SEC in support of the proposed rule changes to improve the utilization of Rules 2165 and 4512, as well as the new Rule 2166 to allow for a temporary delay for suspected fraud.

Get the latest trends, stats, and research on financial markets and securities.