FASB on Market Activities

Published on:
March 27, 2009

SIFMA’s Dealer Accounting Committee (DAC) provides comments to the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) on whether a market is not active and a transaction is not distressed, Staff Position No. 157-e. SIFMA’s DAC does not support the proposed FASB Staff Position (FSP) in its current form. We are very concerned about the presumption in the proposed FSP that all transactions in inactive markets are associated with distressed transactions unless proven otherwise. We believe this presumption directly contradicts the conceptual framework, where transactions are presumed to have been freely negotiated on an arm’s-length basis. More importantly, it is highly unlikely that each piece of pricing information in the possession of a reporting entity is associated with a distressed transaction.

Details

Download

More Content

  • Amicus Briefs
    Oct 05, 2026

    In re The Boeing Company Securities Litigation

  • Letters
    Oct 05, 2026

    Reducing Duplicative Regulation and Expanding Exemptions for Commodity Pool Operators and Commodity Trading Advisors

    SIFMA AMG comments on CFTC proposals to reduce duplicative regulation for certain CPOs and CTAs and account for inflation.
  • Letters
    Sep 30, 2026

    Proposed Rule Change to Amend FINRA Rules 0150, 2165, 4512 and to Adopt FINRA Rule 2166

    SIFMA Comments to SEC in support of the proposed rule changes to improve the utilization of Rules 2165 and 4512, as well as the new Rule 2166 to allow for a temporary delay for suspected fraud.

Get the latest trends, stats, and research on financial markets and securities.