California Tax Conformity with the RIC Modernization Act

Published on:
June 28, 2011

SIFMA, as part of a coalition of 15 companies and organizations, provides comments to the California State Assembly supporting legislation (AB 1423) that would conform California tax provisions to the Regulated Investment Company (RIC) Modernization Act (P.L. 111-325) , which passed Congress in December of 2010.  The groups express that without conformity to the federal rules this year, California RICs and their California shareholder-investors would be subject to materially different federal and California tax rules governing the same investment.  In addition, the groups note the burdens of nonconformity would fall not only on RICs, but also on their investors and the Franchise Tax Board. Without conformity, RICs would also suffer major financial and operational burdens.

Details

Download

More Content

  • Amicus Briefs
    Oct 05, 2026

    In re The Boeing Company Securities Litigation

  • Letters
    Oct 05, 2026

    Reducing Duplicative Regulation and Expanding Exemptions for Commodity Pool Operators and Commodity Trading Advisors

    SIFMA AMG comments on CFTC proposals to reduce duplicative regulation for certain CPOs and CTAs and account for inflation.
  • Letters
    Sep 30, 2026

    Proposed Rule Change to Amend FINRA Rules 0150, 2165, 4512 and to Adopt FINRA Rule 2166

    SIFMA Comments to SEC in support of the proposed rule changes to improve the utilization of Rules 2165 and 4512, as well as the new Rule 2166 to allow for a temporary delay for suspected fraud.

Get the latest trends, stats, and research on financial markets and securities.