The Joint Powers Agreement of the Homeownership Protection Plan in Ontario, CA

Published on:
June 28, 2012

SIFMA and 17 other organization provide comments to the City Council of Ontario, California strongly objecting to the Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) that contemplates the implementation of a so-called,  “Homeownership Protection Plan.” Based on publicly available information on the JPA, the groups are very concerned that the good intentions of the City Council will instead result in significant harm to the residents the JPA intends to help.  The JPA proposes the use of eminent domain to seize mortgage loans from private investors through condemnation, in order to force a restructuring of the mortgage. The groups believe that the contemplated use of eminent domain raises very serious legal and constitutional issues.

The groups also sent similar letters to the City Council of Fontana California and the San Bernardino County California Board of Supervisors.

Details

Download

More Content

  • Letters
    Oct 22, 2026

    Treasury/IRS Notice 2026-49: Guidance on Section 324 of the SECURE 2.0 Act with Respect to Rollovers

    SIFMA supports modernizing retirement plan rollovers through standardized electronic processes, fraud safeguards and appropriate implementation timelines.
  • Amicus Briefs
    Oct 21, 2026

    In re USD LIBOR Litigation

  • Letters
    Oct 20, 2026

    SEC’s Proposed Rule Regulation Crypto Assets

    SIFMA and SIFMA AMG provide recommendations to the SEC on its proposed crypto asset regulation, addressing regulatory clarity, implementation and investor protection.

Get the latest trends, stats, and research on financial markets and securities.