The Joint Powers Agreement of the Homeownership Protection Plan in Ontario, CA

Published on:
June 28, 2012

SIFMA and 17 other organization provide comments to the City Council of Ontario, California strongly objecting to the Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) that contemplates the implementation of a so-called,  “Homeownership Protection Plan.” Based on publicly available information on the JPA, the groups are very concerned that the good intentions of the City Council will instead result in significant harm to the residents the JPA intends to help.  The JPA proposes the use of eminent domain to seize mortgage loans from private investors through condemnation, in order to force a restructuring of the mortgage. The groups believe that the contemplated use of eminent domain raises very serious legal and constitutional issues.

The groups also sent similar letters to the City Council of Fontana California and the San Bernardino County California Board of Supervisors.

Details

Download

More Content

  • Amicus Briefs
    Oct 05, 2026

    In re The Boeing Company Securities Litigation

  • Letters
    Oct 05, 2026

    Reducing Duplicative Regulation and Expanding Exemptions for Commodity Pool Operators and Commodity Trading Advisors

    SIFMA AMG comments on CFTC proposals to reduce duplicative regulation for certain CPOs and CTAs and account for inflation.
  • Letters
    Sep 30, 2026

    Proposed Rule Change to Amend FINRA Rules 0150, 2165, 4512 and to Adopt FINRA Rule 2166

    SIFMA Comments to SEC in support of the proposed rule changes to improve the utilization of Rules 2165 and 4512, as well as the new Rule 2166 to allow for a temporary delay for suspected fraud.

Get the latest trends, stats, and research on financial markets and securities.