Opposing AB 278 & SB 900

Published on:
June 25, 2012

SIFMA and 7 other associations provide comments to the California Conference Committee tasked with reconciling Assembly Bill 278 (Eng et al.) and Senate Bill 900 (Leno et al.), measures that are part of the California Attorney General’s Homeowner Bill of Rights.  The groups believe, as proposed, these measures reflect an overly-complicated approach to prohibiting dual-tracking. In addition, the groups contend that these measures lack clarity around critical definitions, including whether the proposal is truly limited to first lien mortgages.

Details

Download

More Content

  • Letters
    Oct 22, 2026

    Treasury/IRS Notice 2026-49: Guidance on Section 324 of the SECURE 2.0 Act with Respect to Rollovers

    SIFMA supports modernizing retirement plan rollovers through standardized electronic processes, fraud safeguards and appropriate implementation timelines.
  • Amicus Briefs
    Oct 21, 2026

    In re USD LIBOR Litigation

  • Letters
    Oct 20, 2026

    SEC’s Proposed Rule Regulation Crypto Assets

    SIFMA and SIFMA AMG provide recommendations to the SEC on its proposed crypto asset regulation, addressing regulatory clarity, implementation and investor protection.

Get the latest trends, stats, and research on financial markets and securities.