Project KISS Initiative in Regards to Segregation of Independent Amount Requirements

Published on:
September 29, 2017
Submitted to:
CFTC
Submitted by:
SIFMA

Summary

SIFMA provides comments to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) in response to their Project KISS initiative (RIN 3038-AE55) covering the segregation of initial margin (commonly referred to by market participants as “independent amount”, thus “Seg IA”) requirements included in the Commission’s final rules regarding the segregation of assets held as collateral in uncleared swap transactions.  These requirements are overly prescriptive and create unnecessarily burdensome obligations, which in many instances are duplicative or create confusion due to 1.) parallel mandatory collateral segregation requirements found within the final CFTC and U.S. Prudential Regulator rules on margin requirements for non-centrally cleared swaps, and 2.) similar requirements in foreign jurisdictions. The submission includes an appendix that identifies specific aspects the requirements that SIFMA believes would benefit from reevaluation and clarification or revision, as appropriate, to reduce unnecessary burdens for market participants.

See also: CFTC Requests Public Input of Simplifying Rules

Related:

Response to CFTC Project KISS Initiative in Regards to Swap Dealer Registration – September 29, 2017

Response to CFTC Project KISS Initiative in Regards to the Treatment of Inter-Affiliate Swap Transactions – September 29, 2017

Response to CFTC Project KISS Initiative in Regards to Risk Management Program Requirements – September 29, 2017

Response to CFTC’s KISS Initiative in Regards to External Business Conduct Requirements – September 29, 2017

Response to CFTC Request for Information: Project KISS – Recordkeeping (RIN 3038-AE55) – September 28, 2017

Excerpt

September 29, 2017

Mr. Christopher Kirkpatrick

Secretary

U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission

1155 21st Street, NW

Washington, DC 20581

Re: Commodity Futures Trading Commission Request for Public Input on Simplifying Rules (Project KISS); Segregation of Independent Amount Requirements (RIN 3038–AE55)

Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick:

The Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (“SIFMA”)1 greatly appreciates the continuing efforts of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC” or “Commission”) and its staff to review rules, regulations and practices to identify those areas that can be simplified and made less burdensome and costly, including as part of the Commission’s Project KISS initiative.2 As the Commission has implemented many important and significant requirements under Title VII of the Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd Frank”), such a review is timely as both the Commission and market participants have a better understanding of the resulting impacts of such efforts, helping to inform where changes are necessary and appropriate.

One such area we believe would benefit from review and reconsideration are segregation of initial margin (“Seg IA”)3 requirements included in the Commission’s final rules regarding the segregation of assets held as collateral in uncleared swap transactions. 4 These requirements create unnecessarily burdensome obligations, which in many instances are duplicative or create confusion due to parallel mandatory collateral segregation requirements found within the final CFTC 5 and U.S. Prudential Regulator (“PR”)6 rules on margin requirements for non centrally cleared swaps, and similar requirements in foreign jurisdictions. Further, certain Seg IA requirements are overly prescriptive, removing the opportunity for bilateral negotiations between sophisticated market participants who should be allowed to determine what collateral arrangements are most appropriate for their circumstances.

Specifically, the CFTC should streamline the requirements around the segregation requirements for uncleared swaps in CEA Section 4s(l) in light of the parallel requirements in its final margin rules for uncleared swaps, as well the industry’s experience regarding the limited number of segregation arrangements that have been requested by counterparties under CFTC Rules 23.702 and 23.703. The Commission should also explicitly recognize the mandatory margin segregation requirements under other regimes (including U.S. PR rules) as the basis for not requiring Seg IA notices under Rule 23.701. Currently, the Seg IA rule allows a swap dealer (“SD”) to not provide the Seg IA notice to those counterparties that post mandatory initial margin under the CFTC’s uncleared margin rule, but does not explicitly provide the same for counterparties subject to mandatory margin segregation under U.S. PR uncleared margin rules.

The attached appendix identifies specific aspects of the Commission’s Seg IA requirements that SIFMA believes would benefit from reevaluation and clarification or revision, as appropriate, to reduce unnecessary burdens for market participants.

* * *

Please feel free to reach out to the undersigned should you have any questions.

Sincerely,

Kyle Brandon

Managing Director, Head of Derivatives

SIFMA

1 SIFMA is the voice of the U.S. securities industry. We represent the broker-dealers, banks and asset managers whose nearly 1 million employees provide access to the capital markets, raising over $2.5 trillion for businesses and municipalities in the U.S., serving clients with over $18.5 trillion in assets and managing more than $67 trillion in assets for individual and institutional clients including mutual funds and retirement plans. SIFMA, with offices in New York and Washington, D.C., is the U.S. regional member of the Global Financial Markets Association (GFMA). For more information, visit http://www.sifma.org.

2 See Project KISS, 82 FR 21494 (May 9, 2017), available at: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2017-05-09/pdf/2017-09318.pdf; and Press Release, available at: http://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/pr7555-17.

3 While the CFTC regulation refers to “initial margin,” market participants commonly refer to this as “independent amount.” Thus, reference to Seg IA is used in this comment.

4 See Protection of Collateral of Counterparties to Uncleared Swaps; Treatment of Securities in a Portfolio Margining Account in a Commodity Broker Bankruptcy, 78 FR 66621 (Nov. 6, 2013) available at: http://www.cftc.gov/ucm/groups/public/@lrfederalregister/documents/file/2013-26479a.pdf.

5 See Margin Requirements for Uncleared Swaps for Swap Dealers and Major Swap Participants, 81 FR 636 (Jan. 6, 2016) available at: http://www.cftc.gov/idc/groups/public/@lrfederalregister/documents/file/2015-32320a.pdf.

6 See Margin and Capital Requirements for Covered Swap Entities, 80 FR 74840 (Nov. 30, 2015) available at: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2015-11-30/pdf/2015-28671.pdf.

Details

Download

More Content

  • Amicus Briefs
    Oct 05, 2026

    In re The Boeing Company Securities Litigation

  • Letters
    Oct 05, 2026

    Reducing Duplicative Regulation and Expanding Exemptions for Commodity Pool Operators and Commodity Trading Advisors

    SIFMA AMG comments on CFTC proposals to reduce duplicative regulation for certain CPOs and CTAs and account for inflation.
  • Letters
    Sep 30, 2026

    Proposed Rule Change to Amend FINRA Rules 0150, 2165, 4512 and to Adopt FINRA Rule 2166

    SIFMA Comments to SEC in support of the proposed rule changes to improve the utilization of Rules 2165 and 4512, as well as the new Rule 2166 to allow for a temporary delay for suspected fraud.

Get the latest trends, stats, and research on financial markets and securities.