Joint Letter on Opposition to Any Form of the Stock Transfer Tax

Published on:
February 3, 2021
Submitted to:
State of NY
Submitted by:
SIFMA, ADISA, ACLI, American Retirement Association, ASA, Bronx Chamber of Commerce, Brooklyn Chamber of Commerce, Business Council of New York State, Business Council of Westchester, Coalition to Prevent the Taxing of Retirement Savers, COST, Equity Markets Association, FPA, FSI, FXPA, FIA, IIB, IRI, ICI, LICONY, LIA, Managed Funds Association, Manhattan Chamber of Commerce, Modern Markets Initiative, NASDAQ, NYBA,
NYSEDC, NYSE, Partnership for New York City, SPARK Institute, Staten Island Chamber of Commerce

Summary

SIFMA and joint trades provided comments to NY State in opposition to re-imposing any form of a New York State Stock Transaction Tax (STT). Such a tax would damage New York’s position as a global financial capital, resulting in shrinkage of an industry that is the largest contributor to our economy and tax base. i Our organizations represent more than 544,000 workers in the financial services industry in New York State, those throughout the U.S., and other business groups in the state. While some see this as a tax on the securities industry itself, it is actually a tax on working families saving for retirement and college, pension funds that secure retirement for millions, as well as many individual investors, foundations and endowments.

See Also:

Excerpt

February 3, 2021

The Honorable Carl E. Heastie

Speaker of the Assembly

State of New York

LOB 932

Albany, NY 12248

RE: Letter in Opposition to Any Form of the Stock Transfer Tax

Dear Speaker Heastie:

We write in opposition to re-imposing any form of a New York State Stock Transaction Tax (STT). Such a tax would damage New York’s position as a global financial capital, resulting in shrinkage of an industry that is the largest contributor to our economy and tax base. i Our organizations represent more than 544,000 workers in the financial services industry in New York State, those throughout the U.S., and other business groups in the state. While some see this as a tax on the securities industry itself, it is actually a tax on working families saving for retirement and college, pension funds that secure retirement for millions, as well as many individual investors, foundations and endowments.

New York State eliminated collection of a STT in 1981 ii, in response to market globalization and significant technological changes affecting market transactions. During these unprecedented and critical times, a STT targeted at the financial markets will impair New York State’s economy, adversely impact the state’s business environment, and increase the cost of investing for everyday savers and investors. In 2003, when restoration of the tax was proposed, the NYC Independent Budget Office found that reinstating the tax at half the prior rate would increase transaction costs by 23%, eliminate nearly 60,000 private sector jobs, and reduce trading volume by 18%. iii

Continue Reading

Details

Download

More Content

  • Amicus Briefs
    Oct 05, 2026

    In re The Boeing Company Securities Litigation

  • Letters
    Oct 05, 2026

    Reducing Duplicative Regulation and Expanding Exemptions for Commodity Pool Operators and Commodity Trading Advisors

    SIFMA AMG comments on CFTC proposals to reduce duplicative regulation for certain CPOs and CTAs and account for inflation.
  • Letters
    Sep 30, 2026

    Proposed Rule Change to Amend FINRA Rules 0150, 2165, 4512 and to Adopt FINRA Rule 2166

    SIFMA Comments to SEC in support of the proposed rule changes to improve the utilization of Rules 2165 and 4512, as well as the new Rule 2166 to allow for a temporary delay for suspected fraud.

Get the latest trends, stats, and research on financial markets and securities.