Inter-Affiliate Initial Margin Requirements

Published on:
May 13, 2019
Submitted to:
Federal Reserve, FCA, FDIC, FHFA and OCC
Submitted by:
SIFMA, ABA, ABA Securities Association, BPI, CCMC, Financial Services Forum, IIB, ISDA

Summary

SIFMA along with the American Bankers Association (ABA), ABA Securities Association, Bank Policy Institute (BPI), U.S. Chamber’s Center for Capital Markets Competitiveness’s (CCMC), Financial Services Forum, International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA), and the Institute of International Bankers (IIB) provide comments to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve (Federal Reserve), Farm Credit Administration (FCA), Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) requesting they modify their margin rules for non-cleared swaps and security-based swaps to provide an exception from initial margin requirements for swaps and security-based swaps between affiliates, consistent with international standards.

Excerpt

May 13, 2019

The Honorable Jerome Powell

Chairman

Board of Governors of the Federal

Reserve System

20th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20551

The Honorable Jelena McWilliams

Chairman

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

550 17th Street, NW

Washington, DC 20429

The Honorable Joseph Otting

Comptroller of the Currency

Office of the Comptroller of the Currency

400 7th Street, SW

Washington, DC 20219

Barry F. Mardock

Deputy Director

Office of Regulatory Policy

Farm Credit Administration

1501 Farm Credit Drive

McLean, VA 22102-5090

Alfred M. Pollard

General Counsel

Federal Housing Finance Agency

Constitution Center

400 7th Street, SW

Washington, DC 20024

Re: Inter-Affiliate Initial Margin Requirements

Ladies and Gentlemen:

The undersigned trade associations1 are writing to respectfully request that the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve (the “Board”), the Farm Credit Administration (the “FCA”), the Federal Deposit Insurance  Corporation (the “FDIC”), the Federal Housing Finance Agency (the “FHFA”) and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the “OCC” and, together with the Board, the FCA, the FDIC and the FHFA, the “Prudential Regulators”) promptly modify their margin rules for noncleared swaps and security-based swaps to make them consistent with international standards. Specifically, we request that the Prudential Regulators provide an exception from initial margin (“IM”) requirements for swaps and security-based swaps between affiliates (“inter-affiliate swaps”). The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) and regulatory authorities in the European Union, Japan, and most other G20 jurisdictions each currently provides such an exception.

Below we summarize the key considerations supporting this modification to the Prudential Regulators’ margin rules for inter-affiliate swaps. We provide additional details regarding certain of these considerations in Appendix A to this letter.

The Prudential Regulators Are the Only Major G20 Authorities to Impose IA IM Requirements. Firms use inter-affiliate swaps to engage in centralized risk management, which promotes safety and soundness and reduces systemic risk by reducing overall group-wide credit exposure to third parties. Noting that “inter-affiliate swaps do not increase the overall risk profile or leverage of the group,” the CFTC determined that imposing IM requirements on inter-affiliate swaps (“IA IM requirements”) would “substantially increase the overall amount of margin being collected, and thus the cost of swap transactions generally, without a commensurate benefit to risk reduction to the overall group.”2 The CFTC also concluded that IA IM requirements would “limit the ability of U.S. companies to efficiently allocate risk among

affiliates and manage risk centrally.”3

In light of these conclusions, the CFTC excluded inter-affiliate swaps from IM requirements. Instead, the CFTC’s margin rules subject inter-affiliate swaps to variation margin (“VM”) requirements, centralized risk management requirements, and antievasion requirements.4 Authorities in Australia, Brazil, Canada, the European Union, Hong Kong, Japan, Korea, Russia, Singapore, and Switzerland have also exempted interaffiliate swaps from IM requirements, subject to varying conditions.

The Prudential Regulators, in contrast, require the swap dealers, security-based swap dealers, major swap participants, and major security-based swap participants regulated by them (“prudentially regulated swap entities”) to collect and segregate IM from affiliates, in addition to exchanging VM. Prudentially regulated swap entities currently include not only U.S. insured state member banks and national banks, but also foreign subsidiaries of national banks, foreign banks that have branches or bank subsidiaries in the U.S., and foreign banks that do not have any U.S. banking operations.5

Continue reading> 

1 Descriptions of the associations can be found in Appendix B to this letter.

2 Margin Requirements for Uncleared Swaps for Swap Dealers and Major Swap Participants; Final Rule,

81 Fed Reg. 636, 673 (Jan. 6, 2016).

3 Id.

4 See 17 C.F.R. § 23.159.

5 There are currently no prudentially regulated swap entities subject to regulation by the FHFA or FCA.

Accordingly, this letter does not address such entities.

Details

Download

Related Contents

  • Letters
    Dec 05, 2025

    The INVEST Act

  • Letters
    Dec 01, 2025

    Scenarios for the Federal Reserve Board’s 2026 Supervisory Stress Test (Joint Trades)

    Joint trade associations provide comments on the proposed scenarios for the Federal Reserve’s 2026 supervisory stress tests.
  • Letters
    Dec 01, 2025

    Concept Release on Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities Disclosures and Enhancements to Asset-Backed Securities Registration (Joint Trades)

Get the latest trends, stats, and research on financial markets and securities.