Concept Release on Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities Disclosures and Enhancements to Asset-Backed Securities Registration (Joint Trades)

Published on:
December 1, 2025
Submitted to:
SEC
Submitted by:
SIFMA, SIFMA AMG, ABA, MBA, ICBA, SFA, U.S. Mortgage Insurers, and Housing Policy Council

Summary

SIFMA, SIFMA AMG, American Bankers Association (ABA), Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA), Independent Community Bankers of America (ICBA), Structured Finance Association (SFA), U.S. Mortgage Insurers, and the Housing Policy Council provided comments to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) commending the Commission for prioritizing “Asset-Backed Securities Registration and Disclosure Enhancements” on the Spring 2025 Unified Agenda of Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions and are encouraged by the decision to publish a Concept Release to solicit public feedback on disclosure requirements for Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities (RMBS).

Excerpt

December 1, 2025

The Honorable Paul Atkins
Chair
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street NE
Washington, DC 20549

Dear Chairman Atkins:

On behalf of our member organizations, we commend the Commission for prioritizing “Asset-Backed Securities Registration and Disclosure Enhancements” on the Spring 2025 Unified Agenda of Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions. We are particularly encouraged by the decision to publish a Concept Release to solicit public feedback on disclosure
requirements for Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities (RMBS).

We appreciate the Commission’s recognition that a vibrant public RMBS market would be a crucial mechanism for expanding borrowers’ access to mortgage products, reducing mortgage costs, and enhancing housing affordability. Our members, including originators, issuers, servicers, mortgage insurers, sponsors, market makers, and investors, are eager to contribute to this vital discussion to assist the Commission in its important effort to appropriately calibrate and adopt enhancements to Regulation AB (Reg AB II). We collectively support modifications to Reg AB II that broaden the mortgage credit risk investor base, make registered issuance of RMBS a more feasible option for issuers, protect the privacy of consumers, and promote investor protection.

While a robust private-label RMBS market currently operates through Rule 144A transactions, revising Reg AB II to help reinvigorate the public RMBS market alongside the private one would yield significant benefits for U.S. consumers and the housing market. A vibrant registered public RMBS market would broaden the investor base for RMBS, thereby increasing the availability of capital to fund mortgage credit and helping to lower mortgage costs for American families. Additionally, a broader private-label RMBS market is a necessary complement to broader housing finance reform efforts that are a priority of the Administration.

We are grateful for the Commission’s renewed focus on this issue and look forward to actively engaging with you to ensure these important reforms advance successfully to best serve borrowers, market participants, and the broader American economy.

Sincerely,

American Bankers Association
Mortgage Bankers Association
Independent Community Bankers of America
Structured Finance Association
SIFMA
SIFMA-Asset Management Group
U.S. Mortgage Insurers
Housing Policy Council

Details

Download

More Content

  • Letters
    Jan 15, 2026

    Wallet Providers and Broker Dealer Regulation

    SIFMA and SIFMA AMG submitted comments to the SEC Crypto Task Force regarding the regulatory treatment of wallet providers for tokenized securities.
  • Letters
    Jan 13, 2026

    National Securities Exchange Fee Filings

    SIFMA submitted a comment letter to the SEC urging the suspension and disapproval of recent national securities exchange fee increases.
  • Letters
    Dec 19, 2025

    Prohibition on the Use of Reserve Funds by the Consolidated Audit Trail National Market System Plan

    SIFMA submitted a letter to the SEC opposing the proposed amendment to the CAT NMS Plan, which seeks to readopt a vacated funding model. They argue that using reserves built under the invalid model for CAT funding is unlawful and contradicts the court's decision. SIFMA recommends holding reserves in escrow until a new funding path is established.

Get the latest trends, stats, and research on financial markets and securities.