H.R.3299 – Protecting Consumers’ Access to Credit Act of 2017

Published on:
October 11, 2017
Submitted to:
House Committee on Financial Services
Submitted by:
SIFMA

Summary

SIFMA provided comments to the House Committee on Financial Services on  H.R.3299. The Protecting Consumers’ Access to Credit Act of 2017 would codify the valid-when-made doctrine and bring certainty to the legal treatment of all valid loans that are transferred between different entities.

See also:

H.R.3299 – Protecting Consumers’ Access to Credit Act of 2017

Excerpt

October 11, 2017

The Honorable Jeb Hensarling

Chairman, House Committee on Financial

Services

2228 Rayburn House Office Building

Washington, DC 20515

The Honorable Maxine Waters

Ranking Member, House Committee on Financial

Services

2221 Rayburn House Office Building

Washington, DC 20515

Dear Chairman Hensarling and Ranking Member Waters:

The Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (SIFMA)1 urges the House Committee on Financial Services to approve H.R. 3299, the Protecting Consumers’ Access to Credit Act of 2017. Offered by Representatives Patrick McHenry and Greg Meeks, this bill would codify the valid-when-made doctrine and bring certainty to the legal treatment of all valid loans that are transferred between different entities. SIFMA believes that passage of this bill is vital to ensuring liquidity in the market for securitized financial products and in preserving consumers’ access to credit on favorable terms.

Securitization is an important process that expands consumers’ access to credit while allowing lenders to transfer risk to those in the market most willing to bear it. Many of the ways consumers access credit today, either through credit cards, auto loans, or mortgages, depend on securitization and a liquid secondary market for trading in securitized products. Securitization itself depends on the valid-when-made doctrine, which grants investors in securitized products confidence in the value of the underlying assets. Unfortunately, recent court decisions have created legal uncertainty undermining this long-accepted doctrine. SIFMA believes that passage of H.R. 3299 is critical to preventing a disruption in the secondary market for consumer credit. Any potential disruption in this market would ultimately be felt by the consumers in the form of higher interest rates and a reduction in available credit.

Sincerely,

Andy Blocker

Executive Vice President

Public Policy & Advocacy

cc: The Honorable Patrick McHenry; The Honorable Gregory Meeks

1 SIFMA is the voice of the U.S. securities industry. We represent the broker-dealers, banks and asset managers whose nearly 1 million employees provide access to the capital markets, raising over $2.5 trillion for businesses and municipalities in the U.S., serving clients with over $20 trillion in assets and managing more than $67 trillion in assets for individual and institutional clients including mutual funds and retirement plans. SIFMA, with offices in New York and Washington, D.C., is the U.S. regional member of the Global Financial Markets Association (GFMA). For more information, visit http://www.sifma.org

Details

Download

More Content

  • Amicus Briefs
    Oct 05, 2026

    In re The Boeing Company Securities Litigation

  • Letters
    Oct 05, 2026

    Reducing Duplicative Regulation and Expanding Exemptions for Commodity Pool Operators and Commodity Trading Advisors

    SIFMA AMG comments on CFTC proposals to reduce duplicative regulation for certain CPOs and CTAs and account for inflation.
  • Letters
    Sep 30, 2026

    Proposed Rule Change to Amend FINRA Rules 0150, 2165, 4512 and to Adopt FINRA Rule 2166

    SIFMA Comments to SEC in support of the proposed rule changes to improve the utilization of Rules 2165 and 4512, as well as the new Rule 2166 to allow for a temporary delay for suspected fraud.

Get the latest trends, stats, and research on financial markets and securities.