Federal Preemption of State Regulation under NSMIA

Published on:
March 29, 2019

Summary

SIFMA commented on the Federal Preemption of State Regulation under NSMIA: Regulation Best ( collectively, “Reg BI”)).

SIFMA supports strong, substantive conduct standards for broker-dealers and investment advisers that not only enhance investor protection but also preserve investor access to transaction-based advice and a variety of investment products. For those reasons, we generally support the SEC’s current effort to finalize comprehensive federal regulations that will meaningfully raise the bar for BDs when providing personalized investment advice about securities to retail customers.

Excerpt

Via E-Mail to [email protected]

Vanessa Countryman

Acting Secretary

Securities and Exchange Commission

I 00 F Street NE

Washington, DC 20549-1090

Re: Federal Preemption of State Regulation under NSMIA: Regulation Best

Interest (SEC Release No. 34-83062; File No. S7-07-18); and Form CRS Customer Relationship Summary (SEC Release No. 34-83063; IA-4888; File No. S?-08-18).

Dear Ms. Countryman:

The Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (“SIFMA”) 1 appreciates the opportunity to further comment on the above-captioned proposals ( collectively, “Reg BI”)).

As we have consistently stated over the past decade, SIFMA supports strong, substantive conduct standards for broker-dealers (“BDs”) and investment advisers (“IAs”) that not only enhance investor protection but also preserve investor access to transaction-based advice and a variety of investment products. For those reasons, we generally support the SEC’s current effort to finalize comprehensive federal regulations that will meaningfully raise the bar for BDs when providing personalized investment advice about securities to retail customers.

In the meantime, however, a number of states have entered the fray and have proposed or are considering proposing regulations that would create new state-level fiduciary duties for BDs. New Jersey and Maryland, for example, may propose fiduciary duty regulations sometime this year. Nevada is by far the furthest along.

Continue Reading >

Details

Download

More Content

  • Amicus Briefs
    Oct 05, 2026

    In re The Boeing Company Securities Litigation

  • Letters
    Oct 05, 2026

    Reducing Duplicative Regulation and Expanding Exemptions for Commodity Pool Operators and Commodity Trading Advisors

    SIFMA AMG comments on CFTC proposals to reduce duplicative regulation for certain CPOs and CTAs and account for inflation.
  • Letters
    Sep 30, 2026

    Proposed Rule Change to Amend FINRA Rules 0150, 2165, 4512 and to Adopt FINRA Rule 2166

    SIFMA Comments to SEC in support of the proposed rule changes to improve the utilization of Rules 2165 and 4512, as well as the new Rule 2166 to allow for a temporary delay for suspected fraud.

Get the latest trends, stats, and research on financial markets and securities.