e-Delivery in a T+1 Environment

Published on:
August 3, 2022
Submitted to:
SEC
Submitted by:
SIFMA

Summary

SIFMA provided comments to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on the need to modernize its rules to make e-delivery the default mechanism for transmitting investor communications and disclosures in a T+1 environment.

Excerpt

August 3, 2022

Honorable Gary Gensler

Chair

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street N.E.

Washington, DC 20549

Re: E-Delivery in a T+1 Environment

Dear Chair Gensler,

SIFMA1 believes the pending acceleration of the securities settlement cycle heightens the need for the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission” or “SEC”) to modernize its rules to make e-delivery the default mechanism for transmitting investor communications and disclosures.2 As highlighted in SIFMA’s T+1 comment letter, the shortened timeframe for sending confirmations, prospectuses, and disclosures to clients may require the use of e-delivery instead of postal mail to meet the proposed delivery timeframes to comply with Rule 15c6-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) and related rules.3 When receiving e-delivery, retail investors have quicker access to trade details and may identify errors much sooner than for paper delivery. E-delivery is also more secure and environmentally friendly than paper.

Further, as detailed in our letter dated July 18, 2022, a recent survey commissioned by SIFMA demonstrates investor support for making e-delivery the default mechanism for investor communications including confirmations and prospectuses.4 Approximately 85% of individual investors regardless of age or income-level are comfortable with making e-delivery the default so long as there remains an option to opt-in to paper delivery. The survey results also demonstrate that investors still have challenges in signing up for e-delivery because 42% say they still receive paper documents of some kind but want all communications to be delivered electronically. The Commission can greatly reduce the ongoing burden on firms and investors by making e-delivery the default for all investor communications.

Continue Reading

1 The Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (SIFMA) is the leading trade association for broker-dealers, investment banks and asset managers operating in the U.S. and global capital markets. On behalf of our industry’s one million employees, we advocate on legislation, regulation and business policy affecting retail and institutional investors, equity and fixed income markets and related products and services. We serve as an industry coordinating body to promote fair and orderly markets, informed regulatory compliance, and efficient market operations and resiliency. We also provide a forum for industry policy and professional development. SIFMA, with offices in New York and Washington, D.C., is the U.S. regional member of the Global Financial Markets Association (GFMA). For more information, visit http://www.sifma.org.

2 See Shortening the Securities Transaction Settlement Cycle, Exchange Act Release No. 94196 (Feb. 9, 2022) (the “Proposal”).

3 See letter to Vanessa Countryman from Thomas Price and Lindsey Keljo, SIFMA, April 13, 2022 (available at https://www.sifma.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/SIFMA-T1-Comment-Letter-Final-04.13.2022-1.pdf).

4 See letter to Chair Gary Gensler from Kenneth E. Bentsen, Jr., SIFMA, July 18, 2022 (available at https://www.sifma.org/resources/submissions/e-delivery-investor-survey-results/).

Details

Download

More Content

  • Letters
    Jan 15, 2026

    Wallet Providers and Broker Dealer Regulation

    SIFMA and SIFMA AMG submitted comments to the SEC Crypto Task Force regarding the regulatory treatment of wallet providers for tokenized securities.
  • Letters
    Jan 13, 2026

    National Securities Exchange Fee Filings

    SIFMA submitted a comment letter to the SEC urging the suspension and disapproval of recent national securities exchange fee increases.
  • Letters
    Dec 19, 2025

    Prohibition on the Use of Reserve Funds by the Consolidated Audit Trail National Market System Plan

    SIFMA submitted a letter to the SEC opposing the proposed amendment to the CAT NMS Plan, which seeks to readopt a vacated funding model. They argue that using reserves built under the invalid model for CAT funding is unlawful and contradicts the court's decision. SIFMA recommends holding reserves in escrow until a new funding path is established.

Get the latest trends, stats, and research on financial markets and securities.