Joint Trades Capital Requirements for Swap Dealers and Major Swap Participants

Published on:
March 3, 2020
Submitted to:
CFTC
Submitted by:
SIFMA, IIB, ISDA

Summary

SIFMA and joint trades provided the Commodity Futures Trading Commission with comments in response to Capital Requirements for Swap Dealers and Major Swap Participants re-opening the comment period for the Commission’s  2016 release re-proposing capital and financial reporting requirements for swap dealers and major swap participants and amended capital requirements for futures commission merchants.

The trades strongly support the Commission’s decision to solicit additional feedback regarding the 2016 Proposal, especially considering that key elements of the 2016 Proposal cross-referenced capital requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission for security-based swap dealers.

Excerpt

Chris Kirkpatrick

Secretary

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

1155 21st Street NW

Washington, DC 20581

Re: Capital Requirements for Swap Dealers and Major Swap Participants, RIN 3038-AD54, 84 Fed. Reg. 69664 (Dec. 19, 2019)

Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick:

The Institute of International Bankers (“IIB”), the International Swaps and Derivatives Association (“ISDA”), and the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (“SIFMA” and, together with IIB and ISDA, the “Associations”)1 appreciate this opportunity to provide the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “Commission” or “CFTC”) with comments in response to the above-captioned release (the “December 2019 Release”) re-opening the comment period for the Commission’s  2016 release (the “2016 Proposal”) re-proposing capital and financial reporting requirements for swap dealers (“SDs”) and major swap participants (“MSPs”) and amended capital requirements for futures commission merchants (“FCMs”).2

We strongly support the Commission’s decision to solicit additional feedback regarding the 2016 Proposal, especially considering that key elements of the 2016 Proposal cross-referenced capital requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for security-based swap (“SBS”) dealers (“SBSDs”), which were still pending in 2016 but which the SEC later finalized in 2019 (the “Final SEC Rules”).3 In addition, during 2019, three federal banking regulatory agencies finalized key changes to their capital rules in relation to over-the-counter (“OTC”) derivative contracts (the “SA-CCR Rules”),4 which also bear on certain aspects of the 2016 Proposal, and other aspects of the U.S. bank capital framework remain in flux as well.

Continue Reading

Details

Download

More Content

  • Amicus Briefs
    Oct 05, 2026

    In re The Boeing Company Securities Litigation

  • Letters
    Oct 05, 2026

    Reducing Duplicative Regulation and Expanding Exemptions for Commodity Pool Operators and Commodity Trading Advisors

    SIFMA AMG comments on CFTC proposals to reduce duplicative regulation for certain CPOs and CTAs and account for inflation.
  • Letters
    Sep 30, 2026

    Proposed Rule Change to Amend FINRA Rules 0150, 2165, 4512 and to Adopt FINRA Rule 2166

    SIFMA Comments to SEC in support of the proposed rule changes to improve the utilization of Rules 2165 and 4512, as well as the new Rule 2166 to allow for a temporary delay for suspected fraud.

Get the latest trends, stats, and research on financial markets and securities.