*Letters

Basel III Capital Proposal for Trading Activities and Counterparty Credit Risk (Joint Trades)

Published on:
June 18, 2026
Submitted to:
Federal Reserve, FDIC, and OCC
Submitted by:
SIFMA, ISDA, and IIF
File Number:
7100-AH20, 3064-AF29, 1557-AF52
Issue:

Summary

SIFMA, the International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) and the Institute of International Finance (IIF), submitted a comment letter to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Federal Reserve), and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) regarding the proposed Basel III endgame capital framework for large banking organizations and firms with significant trading activity. The letter focuses on issues related to the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (FRTB), credit valuation adjustment (CVA) risk, and counterparty credit risk (CCR), including the treatment of securities financing transactions (SFTs), derivatives, and the standardized approach for counterparty credit risk (SA-CCR).

Excerpt

Executive Summary

The Associations appreciate the Agencies’ efforts to modernize and improve the risk sensitivity of the regulatory capital framework for large banking organizations and firms with significant trading activities. The Associations particularly support the Agencies’ principles-based consideration of the overall calibration of regulatory capital requirements, including taking into account the effects of the stress capital buffer. 3 The current proposal reflects a constructive step forward in several respects, particularly by recognizing the importance of calibration for capital markets and trading activities.

The benefits of appropriately calibrated regulatory capital requirements extend well beyond the prudential regulation of the covered firms themselves. The calibration of the regulatory capital framework directly affects the pricing, availability and structure of market intermediation, client hedging, financing and liquidity services provided by large banking organizations. Capital requirements that are more risk sensitive promote the efficient functioning of U.S. capital markets (including the market for U.S. Treasury securities), reduce costs for end users seeking to hedge or finance positions, and better support market liquidity.

To better achieve these benefits, the final rule should build on the progress reflected in the Proposal by more accurately aligning capital requirements with underlying economic risk, properly recognizing hedging and netting, and supporting prudent risk management and broader public policy objectives.

The Associations’ quantitative impact study (“QIS”) and the technical analysis set out in this letter indicate that several aspects of the Proposal would produce outcomes that are not sufficiently aligned with economic risk. The recommendations in this letter are intended to improve the Proposal’s overall risk sensitivity while preserving the safety and resilience objectives of the capital framework.

Details

More Content

  • Amicus Briefs
    Oct 05, 2026

    In re The Boeing Company Securities Litigation

  • Letters
    Oct 05, 2026

    Reducing Duplicative Regulation and Expanding Exemptions for Commodity Pool Operators and Commodity Trading Advisors

    SIFMA AMG comments on CFTC proposals to reduce duplicative regulation for certain CPOs and CTAs and account for inflation.
  • Letters
    Sep 30, 2026

    Proposed Rule Change to Amend FINRA Rules 0150, 2165, 4512 and to Adopt FINRA Rule 2166

    SIFMA Comments to SEC in support of the proposed rule changes to improve the utilization of Rules 2165 and 4512, as well as the new Rule 2166 to allow for a temporary delay for suspected fraud.

Get the latest trends, stats, and research on financial markets and securities.