Bitounis v. Interactive Brokers LLC

Published on:
September 16, 2024

Court:

Ohio Supreme Court

Amicus Issue:

Whether a broker-dealer or banker may be held liable under Ohio’s aiding and abetting statute, consistent with Boyd v. Kingdom Trust Co., 2018 Ohio 3156, where the alleged aiding and abetting activity involves nothing more that providing usual and customary brokerage/banking services.

Counsel of Record:

Bricker Graydon LLP

Brodi J. Conover

Ryan L. Richardson

Other Amici:

None.

Details

Download

More Content

  • Amicus Briefs
    Oct 05, 2026

    In re The Boeing Company Securities Litigation

  • Letters
    Oct 05, 2026

    Reducing Duplicative Regulation and Expanding Exemptions for Commodity Pool Operators and Commodity Trading Advisors

    SIFMA AMG comments on CFTC proposals to reduce duplicative regulation for certain CPOs and CTAs and account for inflation.
  • Letters
    Sep 30, 2026

    Proposed Rule Change to Amend FINRA Rules 0150, 2165, 4512 and to Adopt FINRA Rule 2166

    SIFMA Comments to SEC in support of the proposed rule changes to improve the utilization of Rules 2165 and 4512, as well as the new Rule 2166 to allow for a temporary delay for suspected fraud.

Get the latest trends, stats, and research on financial markets and securities.