Reissuance for State and Local Bonds

Published on:
March 1, 2019
Submitted to:
IRS
Submitted by:
SIFMA

Summary

SIFMA provides comments to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) in response to request for comment on proposed regulations that address when tax-exempt bonds are treated as retired for the purposes of section 103 and sections 141 through 150 of the Internal Revenue Code. (Re: REG–141739–08: Reissuance of State or Local Bonds)

See also: IRS “Proposal on Reissuance for State and Local Bonds” (pdf)

Excerpt

March 1, 2019

Internal Revenue Service

CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–141739–08)

Room 5203

P.O. Box 7604

Ben Franklin Station,

Washington, DC 20044

Re: REG–141739–08: Reissuance of State or Local Bonds

Ladies and Gentlemen:

The Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (“SIFMA”)1 appreciates this opportunity to respond to the notice of proposed rulemaking (the “Notice”)2 issued by the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) in which the IRS is requesting comment on proposed regulations that address when tax-exempt bonds are treated as retired for the purposes of section 103 and sections 141 through 150 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code).

SIFMA’s key concern regarding the proposed regulations in the Notice is the elimination of the ability of a state or local government to issue tax-exempt premium bonds upon a fixed rate conversion to maturity, without such change being deemed a significant modification that will result in a reissuance. Particularly in a rising interest rate environment, as a result of the de minimis rule, investors have an incentive to purchase premium bonds.3 A rough estimate of the cost to a municipal securities issuer, of issuing par bonds instead of premium bonds, is approximately a 30-60 basis point differential on a 30-year level debt service structure.

If you have any questions, or would like to discuss this further, please do not hesitate to contact me at (212) 313-1130.

Sincerely yours,

Leslie M. Norwood

Managing Director and

Associate General Counsel

cc: John J. Cross III, Associate Tax Legislative Counsel, U.S. Department of the Treasury

Spence Hanemann, Office of Associate Chief Counsel, Financial Institutions & Products, Internal Revenue Service

1 SIFMA is the leading trade association for broker-dealers, investment banks and asset managers operating in the U.S. and global capital markets. On behalf of our industry’s nearly 1 million employees, we advocate on legislation, regulation and business policy, affecting retail and institutional investors, equity and fixed income markets and related products and services. We serve as an industry coordinating body to promote fair and orderly markets, informed regulatory compliance, and efficient market operations and resiliency. We also provide a forum for industry policy and professional development. SIFMA, with offices in New York and Washington, D.C., is the U.S. regional member of the Global Financial Markets Association (GFMA). For more information, visit http://www.sifma.org.

2 83 Fed. Reg. 67701 (Dec. 31, 2018).

3 See, e.g.: https://www.pimco.com/en-us/resources/education/understanding-the-de-minimis-tax-rule

Details

Download

More Content

  • Letters
    Mar 19, 2026

    Proposed Rule Change to Extend the Exchange’s U.S. Equity Trading Hours to 23 Hours a Day

    SIFMA comments to the SEC on Nasdaq’s proposal to expand equity and ETP trading hours to 23 hours a day, five days a week.
  • Letters
    Mar 19, 2026

    Proposed Rule Change to Allow for Trading of Multi-Listed Equity Options during Global Trading Hours

    SIFMA comments to the SEC on Cboe’s proposal to expand trading of multi-listed equity options during Global Trading Hours.
  • Letters
    Mar 18, 2026

    Proposed Rule Change to Amend FINRA Rule 2210

    SIFMA comments in support of FINRA’s proposed Rule 2210 changes, urging closer alignment with the SEC’s Marketing Rule.

Get the latest trends, stats, and research on financial markets and securities.