Federal Preemption of State Regulation under NSMIA

Published on:
March 29, 2019

Summary

SIFMA commented on the Federal Preemption of State Regulation under NSMIA: Regulation Best ( collectively, “Reg BI”)).

SIFMA supports strong, substantive conduct standards for broker-dealers and investment advisers that not only enhance investor protection but also preserve investor access to transaction-based advice and a variety of investment products. For those reasons, we generally support the SEC’s current effort to finalize comprehensive federal regulations that will meaningfully raise the bar for BDs when providing personalized investment advice about securities to retail customers.

Excerpt

Via E-Mail to rule-comments@sec.gov

Vanessa Countryman

Acting Secretary

Securities and Exchange Commission

I 00 F Street NE

Washington, DC 20549-1090

Re: Federal Preemption of State Regulation under NSMIA: Regulation Best

Interest (SEC Release No. 34-83062; File No. S7-07-18); and Form CRS Customer Relationship Summary (SEC Release No. 34-83063; IA-4888; File No. S?-08-18).

Dear Ms. Countryman:

The Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (“SIFMA”) 1 appreciates the opportunity to further comment on the above-captioned proposals ( collectively, “Reg BI”)).

As we have consistently stated over the past decade, SIFMA supports strong, substantive conduct standards for broker-dealers (“BDs”) and investment advisers (“IAs”) that not only enhance investor protection but also preserve investor access to transaction-based advice and a variety of investment products. For those reasons, we generally support the SEC’s current effort to finalize comprehensive federal regulations that will meaningfully raise the bar for BDs when providing personalized investment advice about securities to retail customers.

In the meantime, however, a number of states have entered the fray and have proposed or are considering proposing regulations that would create new state-level fiduciary duties for BDs. New Jersey and Maryland, for example, may propose fiduciary duty regulations sometime this year. Nevada is by far the furthest along.

Continue Reading >

Details

Download

Other

  • LettersNov 19, 2025

    The OCC-Model Approach under Rule 15c3-3

  • LettersNov 19, 2025

    Request for Extension of the Compliance Date for Amendments to Regulation S-P (Joint Trades)

  • LettersNov 12, 2025

    Proposed Rulemaking on Stress Test Transparency and Capital Planning Requirements (Joint Trades)

Get the latest trends, stats, and research on financial markets and securities.