Digital-Asset Related Illicit Finance and National Security Risks

Published on:
November 3, 2022
Submitted to:
Treasury Department
Submitted by:
SIFMA

Summary

SIFMA provides comments to the U.S. Department of the Treasury (Treasury) in response to their September 20, 2022 Request for Comment on “Ensuring Responsible Development of Digital Assets” as it pertains to illicit finance and national security risks. SIFMA supports the development of safe, regulated digital asset markets, and are encouraged by the ongoing work that was directed by the Executive Order 14067, “Ensuring Responsible Development of Digital Assets.”

See also: SIFMA Provides Comments to the Treasury Re: Ensuring Responsible Development of Digital Assets, August 8, 2022

Excerpt

November 3, 2022

United States Department of the Treasury

1500 Pennsylvania Avenue NW

Washington, D.C. 20220

Re: Ensuring Responsible Development of Digital Assets; Request for Comment on Digital-Asset Related Illicit Finance and National Security Risks

Ladies and Gentlemen:

The Securities and Financial Markets Association (“SIFMA”) appreciates the opportunity to respond to the Treasury Department’s September 20, 2022 Request for Comment (“RFC”) on “Ensuring Responsible Development of Digital Assets” as it pertains to illicit finance and national security risks.1 SIFMA supports the development of safe, regulated digital asset markets, and are encouraged by the ongoing work that was directed by the Executive Order 14067, “Ensuring Responsible Development of Digital Assets”

(hereafter “the Executive Order”).2  This effort, which has already resulted in the publication of several well-considered reports, is an important step towards a better understanding of the evolving digital assets marketplace and its prospects; how responsible innovation can serve and protect investors; and more generally, how the United States can ensure that it retains the same leadership role in digital asset capital markets as it has in the “traditional” capital markets space.

In this letter, we:

  • Illustrate how regulated financial institutions (both banks and non-banks, such as our broker-dealer members) are well-positioned to manage the illicit financing risks posed by digital assets;
  • Suggest that regulators review existing rules and operating models to best engage with digital assets and blockchain infrastructure;
  • Describe how new digital ledger technologies (“DLT”) can be employed to help better manage illicit financing risks; and
  • And posit that a “wholesale” CBDC (“wCBDC”) or alternative which builds on the existing role of regulated financial institutions would allow for better management of illicit financing risks relative to a more widely adopted “retail” (“rCBDC”) model.

Continue Reading

______

1 87 Fed. Reg. 57556 (Sept. 20, 2022), https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2022-09-20/pdf/2022-20279.pdf.

2 Exec. Order No. 14067, 87 Fed. Reg. 14143 (Mar. 14, 2022), https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/

03/14/2022-05471/ensuring-responsible-development-of-digital-assets.

Details

Download

More Content

  • Amicus Briefs
    Mar 20, 2026

    Johnson & Johnson v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assoc.

  • Letters
    Mar 19, 2026

    Proposed Rule Change to Extend the Exchange’s U.S. Equity Trading Hours to 23 Hours a Day

    SIFMA comments to the SEC on Nasdaq’s proposal to expand equity and ETP trading hours to 23 hours a day, five days a week.
  • Letters
    Mar 19, 2026

    Proposed Rule Change to Allow for Trading of Multi-Listed Equity Options during Global Trading Hours

    SIFMA comments to the SEC on Cboe’s proposal to expand trading of multi-listed equity options during Global Trading Hours.

Get the latest trends, stats, and research on financial markets and securities.